A Little Rant About the SAG Awards

I liked the SAG Awards last night. They were short and sweet and didn’t have the fluff that most awards ceremonies force you to sit through. My favorite moments were the acceptance speeches from Octavia Spencer and Viola Davis and the cast of Bridesmaids yukking it up.

But, out of all the things I liked, there were 2 things that bugged me.

The first was something about the show in general. As SAG member Pam Munro pointed out to me in an email, the tickets for the awards were, according to their website, $800. “Who can PAY that? Certainly not most of the rank & file!” she said.

I absolutely agree. For most of us, $800 is a lot of change. That’s headshots and prints. Rent. 3 Months of acting classes. One drunken night on Sunset. It’s almost like the powers that be want to keep you and me from attending by keeping the price high, isn’t it? 

I know these things cost a lot to put on but you can’t tell me that SAG doesn’t make money off of the broadcast.

I have an idea for next year: SAG (and presumably AFTRA now) should keep a block of tickets allocated for each branch. Each branch could then take their top 10 earners (actors who made the most that year) and offer them tickets to the awards for $150 (or $300 for two – we have to take out dates, right?). If those actors decline, put those tickets back into the ticket pool and charge their $800.

What do you think of that idea?

The second thing was something that truly annoyed me. It was the salute to the branches around the country. In the segment, they featured working actors from branches like Texas and Chicago. Loved it! In fact, they should have featured more branches.

In the final part of the video, they showcased the Las Vegas branch. Who did they feature? That hard working, yet unknown actor Mike Tyson.


We have over 200,000 members and they give a shout-out to Mike Tyson?

I like Tyson. I really do (plus, if I don’t, he could come to my house and hit me in the face) but come on, SAG. You couldn’t spotlight another actor who’s night or even career, could have been made from 10 seconds of screen time on the show?

Yeah, they were probably trying to be funny but seriously, who benefits more? The one’s who pay the dues. The one’s who’ve studied and struggled to do something we love?

Or Mike Tyson?


  1. Karen

    February 1, 2012 at 11:57 am

    the top 10 earners? The top 10 earners can probably afford the $800 ticket!

  2. Lance Carter

    February 1, 2012 at 2:41 pm

    It would be nice if they could 🙂 But I’m thinking the actors from the Baltimore/DC branch, Dallas and Florida might not be able to, you know?

  3. Karen

    February 1, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    True. I just heard today on NPR that the richest people in the US are not the moneyed Republicans, but what they call “Hollywood Democrats”. So I’m wondering if on those lower echelons of Baltimore, etc., they might make a pretty penny also, maybe not a pretty quarter, but a pretty penny.
    I totally agree about that Mike Tyson reference, in the original article. I thought: Mike Tyson isn’t an actor – oh wait, now he is!

Leave a Reply

Sterling K. Brown on Becoming an Actor: “You get bit, and you just keep chasing that”
"I was used to being 'that dude from that show, who got shot in that episode'" - Sterling K. Brown
Richard Dreyfuss on Winning an Oscar: “You’re riskier when you’re on the hunt”
"I had no doubt of my eventual success." - Richard Dreyfuss
‘Stranger Things’ Star Shannon Purser on Getting Cast as Barb
"I had never booked anything, gotten close calls, and then one day I got an email about this new show called Stranger Things, asking for a tape." - Shannon Purser
Watch: SAG Conversations on Broadway with Andy Karl
Karl recalls his highs and lows on stages and reveals the charming side that has made him a huge star.
Watch: SAG Conversations with Alexander Skarsgard of ‘Big Little Lies’
Skarsgard talks about his career and work on HBO's 'Big Little Lies'